Write Denver City Council – Name Change, Columbus Park To La Raza Park

Model of Aztec human sacrificial temple in Denver
The Denver City Council is considering Changing the name of “Columbus Park” to La Raza Park. “La Raza” is Spanish for “The Race”. It is a ethnic and racial concept developed by the most important pro-Nazi propagandist in Latin America in World War II. “La Raza” is one of the basic principles of the ideology of the militant Chicano political movement, which the name change is intended to honor.

Please write the Denver City Council Members and request that they not change the name, or if they must change the name, request that they use a name that is, at least, not obviously racist and is more inclusive than this Hispanic, mestizo, racial concept, which was invented by a Mexican Nazi. Their addresses are below.


You can contact the Mayor Michael Hancock here.

In recent years, National Hispanic organizations have been backing away from using the term, “La Raza”, as well as other terms associated with the radical, political Chicano movement. The “National Council of La Raza” changed their name three years ago in July of 2017, dropping “La Raza” from their name. Now the organization is called “UnidosUS”.

They did not say so directly, but it seems this was due to the racialist name becoming an embarrassment for them and for the organization to be more inclusive. In this his article, they do write that the name change came after accusations started years ago about “La Raza” meaning “The Race” and accusations that the National Council of La Raza had a brown racist agenda.

National Council of “La Raza” changes its name to UnidosUS

Anyone with enough intelligence to be able to use a Spanish/English dictionary can learn that the word actually does mean “The Race”. In recent years, we have learned more about Vasconcelos’ bizarre racial theory, which explains why they call themselves La Raza / The Race.

The national Chicano student organization, MEChA (Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan) has also changed its name dropping the words “Chicano” and “Aztlan” to be more inclusive, they said.

Turmoil over MEChA name change was decades in coming

Fans of the La Raza concept try to obfuscate the meaning, claiming it means “The People”, but it really does mean “The Race”, just as it sounds to English speakers. Spanish has two words that mean “The People”, that is “La Gente” and “El Pueblo” (as in people of a nation). If the term was really intended to mean “The People”, they would have used one of these two terms normally used for that purpose.

The origins of this term may not be understood by many, even among Hispanics, however, the “La Raza” concept – on which the Chicano political ideology is to a large extent based — is a Hispanic mestizo racial supremacy theory formulated by a very prominent Mexican politician, educator and philosopher, Jose Vasconcelos. Vasconcelos explained his concept in a book entitled, “La Raza Cosmica”, which is available via Amazon and other book retailers under the correctly-translated name of “The Cosmic Race“. He believed that the Hispanic, mixed race would evolve into the ultimate race. Vasconcelos was also an extreme anti-Semite, extremely anti-American and the most important paid, Nazi propagandist in Latin America at the start of WWII.

Nazi Father of “La Raza”, Jose Vasconcelos

That Forgotten Mexican Nazi Named Jose Vasconcelos

This is an article that Jose Vasconcelos, the Father of La Raza, wrote justifying the notorious anti-Semitic tract used by the Nazis to demonize Jews, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”.

In Self-Defense: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion by Jose Vasconcelos

Already featured in the park is a model of an Aztec temple, designed to be suggestive of the Templo Mayor, the most important site for mass human sacrifice in the Aztec empire. Uncounted thousands of victims were sacrificed there, having their hearts cut out of their chests while still living. Their still-beating heart was offered the sun god, Huitzilopochtli, as the victim looked on, writhing in extreme agony and died. Parts of the victims were often eaten by the priests in ritualistic cannibalism.

Templo Mayor, an Aztec priest performing the sacrificial offering
of a living human’s heart to the war god Huitzilopochtli.

If the goal is to celebrate Mexican heritage, a blood-soaked, Aztec, human-sacrificial temple is not generally featured in town squares in Mexico. Generally, the status symbol for a Mexican town is to have a more innocuous, French gazebo in the town square, not a memorial to Aztec human sacrifice.

Small City of Guamas in Sonora, Mexico
Typical Mexican town square features a church, French gazebo and government buildings,
but not a monument to Aztec mass human sacrifice,

To avoid making a mockery out of the wonderful city of Denver, request that they not change the name of the Park to “La Raza Park”.

There is nothing wrong with “Columbus Park”. The charges utopian fanatics are making against Columbus are extreme and propagandistic. However, if the name must be changed, they should make it something less polarizing and more inclusive, than “La Raza Park”, in order to not disgrace the City of Denver.

“La Raza Cosmica” by Jose Vasconcelos (1925)
Defined the “La Raza” ethnic/racial concept

Reconquista Protesters Burn Trump In Effigy In Tijuana

Searching for news about the Devil’s caravan, I came across this article about protesters burning Trump in effigy at the border while demanding the return of the “lost territories”. At least, these protesters are telling the truth for a change about what illegal immigration is really about. Ironically, this occurred at “Friendship Park” or right next to it on the beach.

By the way the Devil’s Caravan never amounted to much as a mass caravan. There are still small groups of fake refugees sneaking across the southern border of Mexico separately, though, and heading north to our border.

Burning Trump in effigy at Friendship Park
Trump effigy engulfed in flames at Friendship Park

The signs below read from left to right:

“Rise Mexican, Let us reclaim the territories that they robbed from us.
“Trump, Half the territory of the US is ours.”
“Trump, Let the Mexicans enter the US to work in the territories that you robbed from us in 1848.”
“Trump, We are not paying for your wall.”

The signs that the protesters are holding also have similar statements on them about the return of the territories that have been robbed from them.

Reconquista signs at protest in Tijuana.

The article translation follows, below.

Trump pinata burned at border wall

They protest in Tijuana against the anti-immigrant policies of the US president.

About 50 people protested this Sunday in Tijuana, on the border wall that divides this city in Baja California from San Diego in the US, over the anti-immigrant policies of the administration of President Donald Trump and burned a piñata of him in effigy.

‘Trump, let Mexicans enter the United States to work in the territories that they robbed from us in 1848,’ said a banner placed on the dividing wall, referring to the treaty by which Mexico ceded almost half of its territory to the United States, after a war between the two countries.

A migrant climbed the fence that divides the two countries and placed a Mexican flag while another held a sign that said ‘Trump, we will not pay for your wall.’

Protesters burned a Donald Trump piñata in effigy because of the way in which the US president expresses himself regarding Mexicans, said the president of the migrant organization Ángeles Sin Fronteras (Angles without Borders), Sergio Tamai.

During his first presidential campaign, Trump said Mexican immigrants were ‘rapists’ who bring ‘drugs’ and ‘crime’ to the United States.

‘One proof of that lie is that of the Mexicans who are in the United States, last year they sent us more than 35 billion dollars,’ Tamai said, referring to the remittance flows sent by Mexicans working in the United States. .

‘What would become of Mexico if it weren’t for those remittances?’, said the activist. ‘It is the irrefutable proof that those who cross are working people, they are not criminals and if they were, they would not send us so many millions of dollars.’

Tamai demanded that the Mexican government rethink the USMCA trade agreement (between the two countries and Canada) because the immigration situation was not discussed with respect to legalizing those already living in the United States.

‘We were reminding Trump that Mexican labor is what made the United States what it is,’ said Lourdes Lizardi, representative of the Tijuana Migrant Alliance.

Migration has been a vital issue between Mexico and the United States since Trump launched the presidency and threatened to place a wall between the two countries paid by Mexicans.

AMLO: Mexicans Are Now Reconquering Their Lands (Video)

As a candidate for the Mexican presidency, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (aka AMLO) says Mexicans are now reconquering their lands using “human rights” of illegal immigrants as the excuse for their lawlessness.

Watch this video on Bitchute.

This clip was uploaded in February, 2017 to a channel named Reconquista.Mx. This was early on during the campaign for the Mexican presidency.

Reconquista Territorial y de Derechos Humanos: AMLO


This map below — in spite of the side label “Mexico en 1794” — shows the land claimed by Spain in their colonial province called, “New Spain”. Note that the area is labeled “New Mexico” in the map, which was another Spanish province, not an area populated by a majority of Mexicans. Even today in the US state of Mexico many people still say they are of Spanish origin not Mexican.

Mexico was not a separate country in 1794 and was only one part of “New Spain” in the the southern part of New Spain. After Mexico declared independence in 1821, they claimed all of the land in the area claimed by Spain. They had no real legal right to it, other than rule by force, which was the same claim that Spain had exercised over the territory. Very few of the inhabitants in the area — that is now a part of the USA — identified as “Mexican”. The great majority were at that time Spanish and Indians.

The population of Mexico was much too far away across hundreds of miles of desert land to retain control of this area that is now part of the US. The US occupied the area by force, which was the only claim that Mexico had. So, the Mexicans should not be complaining now that they are not able to enforce their original weak claim on the territory. Americans should not allow Mexican nationalists now to takeover the territory, based on their false historical, propagandistic narrative.

Before 1670, Spain and Portugal claimed all of North and South America. Does that mean all of the western hemisphere should belong to Mexico and other Hispanic nations? That would be ludicrous. However, this is actually also a claim that is promoted by open borders extremists among illegal immigrants, that the entire hemisphere belongs to “La Raza”, the Hispanic/indigenous mixed race and they should be able to migrant wherever they want to go in the hemisphere, unhindered by any American immigration law.