Vivek Ramaswamy Is NOT A Natural Born Citizen

Vivek Ramaswamy seems to have admitted that he is not a natural-born citizen and therefore not constitutionally eligible to be elected President. In the following video, the moderator says his age is 38, and slightly later (00:34) Ramaswamy says his parents moved to this country 40 years ago.

Unless his parents were already citizens when they moved here, they were not citizens when he was born. A person has to live in the US for at least 5 years before they can even apply to become a citizen.

They probably were here on a temporary visa. They may have had Vivek to improve their chances of gaining permanent residency and eventually becoming citizens.

The requirement in the Constitution is that a candidate for the presidency be a natural-born citizen. If they had meant just born in the US, the Framers would have simply said that. The Framers of the Constitution were not stupid. They did not use words that had absolutely no meaning.

A natural-born citizen is a term from the philosophy of natural law. It means basically the child of American parents born in the US, who has no claim on the citizenship of another country. Vivek was the child of two Asian Indian parents when he was born and therefore had the right to Indian citizenship when he was born.

Some people, mainly progressives, think that public opinion or the decision of a judge — legislating from the bench — should be enough to change the Constitution. Americans should NOT go along with that.

This is the same way that judges legislating from the bench discovered a non-existent, right to abortion in the Constitution. They made it up on the fly!

Kamala Harris is not eligible for the vice-presidency in the same way and neither is Nikki Haley. To draw an analogy, because a bank has been robbed 3-4 times and the robbers got away with it does not change the law for the future. Americans should just refuse to vote for ineligible candidates. They should also publicly denounce such candidates. It is more than disgusting that two ineligible candidates were on the Republican debate stage, without anyone saying anything about it.

It is extremely dangerous to allow progressives and others of their ilk to just change the Constitution at will. They are also working hard to diminish and erase the 1st and 2nd Amendments. Should those parts of the Constitution also be changed on the fly according to the current public whim?

If any person born here would be eligible to become president, then two illegal aliens or a couple on tourist visas could conceive and give birth to an American president. That would be absurd and certainly not what the Framers of the Constitution intended. The 14th Amendment did not address or change the original, basic presidential eligibility requirement and it was never intended to do so. Yet, the 14th Amendment is often used to claim that anyone born in the U.S. can become president no matter how tenuous the connect of the family is to the US.

Americans should be a part of preserving the original intent of the Constitution, not its destruction. You can do that in this situation by denouncing those shameless candidates who are not eligible and refusing to vote for them.

Related Posts:
Who is a natural-born citizen?


Thumbnail image

Constitutional Originalists Advocate Barring Trump From Election

Two very conservative constitutional scholars have submitted an article that will be published in the prestigious, University of Pennsylvania Law Journal. They argue that Trump is already legally disqualified from holding office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment due to aiding and abetting an insurrection. Authors William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen are “originalists” and members of the conservative Federalist Society, as are two-thirds of the Supreme Court, including recent Trump appointees. The term “Originalist” means they believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution as the Framers intended.

Conservative lawyers argue Trump is legally disqualified from holding office

Please forgive me for sharing a video from MSNBC. However, you can consider it intelligence information, because it shows what the plan of attack by the Democrats will be, to bar Trump from being a candidate. If this succeeds in only 1-2 key battleground states, it could become impossible for Trump to win the general election.

No conviction by trial is necessary. The appointed election officials in each state are authorized to decide who is qualified to be a candidate. The authors urge all officials and courts to uphold the Constitution in this matter. Of course, this would be challenged in court and probably go to the Supreme Court. In regard to this issue, Trump does not have a very good record of success in court. It appears that a couple of Congressmen and Senators could potentially be removed from office for the same reason.

Gavin Newsom already tried to bar Trump from the primary ballot in 2020 but was overruled by a court. This effort, though, will likely be much better received by the courts.

Of course, the idea of banning Trump from the ballot will greatly appeal to Democrats and Progressives. I expect a large movement of blue states seeking to ban Trump as a candidate for the presidency. If a precedent is created in court then probably many if not all of the Red states will end up going along with it, if for no other reason than a lawsuit is filed to compel them to comply and ban Trump as a candidate.

Six southern states also have there own state laws against insurrectionists holding office that may be used to assists those trying to ban Trump from the ballot in those very critical states, which might otherwise be considered solidly pro-Trump.

A federal court already ordered a county commissioner in New Mexico, Couy Griffin, to be removed from office and banned from future office, due to his participation in the J6 insurrection, found to be a violation of the 14th Amendment.

Text of the article by Baude and Paulsen

If nothing else, just read the abstract on the first page of the article, below.
664341170-Trump-Can-t-Run
Click here to download article or view full-screen


Thumbnail image:

San Diego Protests Drag Queen Story Hour At New Children’s Museum

This is a video of the protest against the Drag Queen Story Hour, held on August 5, 2023 at the so-called New Children’s Museum in San Diego.

Watch on Facebook

The Drag Queen Grooming Session for children went forward as planned. It was considered a private event, not part of the regular activities of the New Children’s Museum. The rest of the museum was closed, though. There were dozens of people, maybe a hundred, who showed up to protest the grooming session. A somewhat larger group of people showed up to support the grooming of children to accept deviant sexuality.

The Museum advertised the event on their website as an opportunity to provide glamorous queer role models to children.

Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) is just what it sounds like—drag queens reading stories to children in an inclusive, safe and loving environment. DQSH captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive and unabashedly queer role models. In spaces like this, kids are able to imagine a world where people can present as they wish and where dress-up is real!

The Museum was closed to the public in order to cater to the drag queen grooming. That shows you very well what their priorities are. It’s not really a “museum” but more like an indoor playground. It’s designed to attract as many kids as possible. Parents should consider taking their kids to a municipal playground or other playground that does not have a sexual, political agenda that they hope to impose on innocent and impressionable children.

The counter-protest included a self-described, Communist organization (Party for Socialism and Liberation) and an anarcho-Communist group (Antifa). The Drag Queen events are, of course, part of a Communist/Neo-Marxist/Progressive movement to take over the minds of small children and even toddlers.

Related Article:
Drag-Queen Grooming At ‘New Children’s Museum San Diego

Thumbnail:

Will Hurd: Trump Is Running To Stay Out Of Prison

Presidential candidate Will Hurd said in Iowa that Trump is not running to make America great again, but to stay out of prison. One important point to keep in mind is that state crimes cannot be pardoned by the president.

Trump will be prosecuted in at least two state courts. In New York, he is charged with paying hush money to a porno star. Also, he is expected to be indicted any day now in state court in Georgia for racketeering in regard to his attempt to overturn the election.

It seems doubtful he would be sentenced to a prison sentence for paying off the porno queen. However, the racketeering charge is much more serious. If he is convicted before the election on racketeering, he stands a good chance of already being put in prison before election day.

The elected president cannot pardon him for a state crime. That also means, even if Trump is elected, he cannot pardon himself for a state crime. Trump could be the first president to serve out his term as president in Georgia state prison.

On the other hand, a sitting president cannot be prosecuted by a state court. So, he must try to delay the state trial until after the election. If he can do that, would expect that any state trial would be halted until he leaves office.

Related Article:
‘He Quit Congress’: Trump Knocks GOP Candidate Will Hurd Over ‘Prison’ Dig

Thumbnail

Drag-Queen Grooming At ‘New Children’s Museum’ San Diego

Below is a notification of a protest of the Drag Queen Story Hour at the New Children’s Museum in San Diego is being circulated anonymously on the Internet. People feel that these events are being held to sexualize children and indoctrinate them into deviant sexual lifestyles and are not appropriate for public events, or private either for that matter. We should not even have to say that small children should not be sexualized and groomed by sexual deviants, who want to recruit innocent little ones.

Update:

The Drag Queen Grooming Session for children went forward as planned. It was considered a private event, not part of the regular activities of the New Children’s Museum. The rest of the museum was closed, though. There were dozens of people who showed up to protest the grooming session. There was a somewhat larger group of people who showed up to support the grooming of children to accept deviant sexuality. That the Museum was closed to heterosexuals in order to cater to the drag queen grooming, shows you very well what their priorities are. It’s not really a “museum” but more like an indoor playground. It’s designed to attract as many kids as possible. Parents should consider taking their kids to a municipal or other playground that does not have a sexual, political agenda that they want to impose on innocent and impressionable children.

See video of the protest at this link: San Diego Protests Drag Queen Story Hour At New Children’s Museum

Event Information

I am not organizing this event, just sharing the information. This event has a page on the museum’s website, but it is not on their regular calendar. You have to search for it to find the event page here. I believe that shows they fear blowback from the public. A little public outrage may well cause them to stop hosting these alternative sexual-lifestyle grooming events for children.

The Drag Queen grooming for kids event starts at 10 am. Those opposing may want to be on-site at the entrance at least half an hour early to catch people as they go inside to the Drag Queen Brainwashing Event. There is (credit card) paid street parking in the area, a couple of dollars for two hours increments.

This is a quote from the museum website.

DQSH captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive and unabashedly queer role models. In spaces like this, kids are able to imagine a world where people can present as they wish and where dress-up is real!

Thus, they say pretty plainly that their object is giving children sexually-deviant role models and encouraging them to experiment with their sexual identity even long before they reach puberty.

This is apparently the second drag queen grooming hour they have had in the past year or two. The last one was on last September 25, though they don’t say which year..

Drag Queen Opposition

Even one “drag queen” opposes such events, because they are harmful to children.

Ideological Connections

I classify these events as neo-Marxist provocation. Simply stated, classical Marxism is about class warfare, the bourgeoisie against the proletariat, that is the middle class against the lower classes.

Neo-Marxism is about class warfare in a more general sense between traditional supporters of the current society and many other classes based on race, sexual preference, gender identity, etc, who want to “transform” society. Neo-Marxists want to turn social values upside down to create societal tumult. The idea is to promote revolutionary transformation, whether it be peaceful or violent.

These events also appear to be related to the ongoing transgender mania, in which children are encouraged to take puberty-blocking hormones and have their sexual organs surgically removed, sometimes without the consent of their parents. They appear to appear to be a stepping stone for indoctrination of children into transgender ideology.

Contacts / Board Members

Their contact info is not available on the museum website. We may be able to find their telephone numbers or social media pages. If we can’t find numbers for these people, you can call their business and lodge a complaint that they support this.

Board Chair: Rebecca Gennaro
Wells Fargo

Vice Board Chair: Greg Gossard
The Hampstead Companies

Board Secretary: Danielle Moore
Port Commissioner + Clean Energy Counsel LLP

Claudia Amezcua
Qualcomm

Brent M. Douglas
Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP

Stephanie Epstein
Epstein Family Foundation

Lynda Forsha
Art Advisory Services

Priya Huggett
CGS3

Jamie Inn
U.S. Bank

Robert Marasco
Marasco Mediation, LLC

Wendi McKenna
Move Play Grow

Laurie Mitchell
Physician

Merrilee Neal
Community Member + Philanthropist

Bill Payne
Second Chance

Caroline Perry
San Diego Padres

Maryanne Pfister
Retired Marketing Professional

Elizabeth Phelps
Philanthropist

Marisol Rendón
Southwestern College

Tom Rosso
Inscripta

Lawrence Taylor
Brandes Investment Partners

Bill Watkins
Solar Turbines Incorporated

Related Post:
San Diego Protests Drag Queen Story Hour At New Children’s Museum