Kwame Nkrumah was also hailed as a Messiah, like Obama has been, as the article below shows. Nkrumah was the socialist dictator of Ghana, the first African county to win its independence (from the British) after WWII. He was influenced by American Black Nationalists/pan Africanists, W.E.B. Dubois and Marcus Garvey and met with Malcolm X in the 1960’s.
He started a youth organization, the Young Pioneers, that some compared to the Nazi Hitler Youth. This idea of a black messiah, who is like a God, goes back a long way in the history of Black Nationalism in America as well as in Africa. It didn’t start with Obama. Ghana was one of the countries that Obama honored with a visit on his first trip abroad after his inauguration in 2009. There is an old belief that you need dictatorship in order to liberate blacks from American (Western) white oppression.
Obama is someone who identifies with Islam, even though he does not practice the religion. Below is the definition of “cultural Muslim” given by the Wiki. The term means someone, who identifies with Islamic culture, but does not practice the religion. Obama had a father from an ethnically Muslim family, which he embraced in preference to his extended Christian family.
Obama in Muslim Dress
Jeremiah Wright declared that the God they worship at Trinity UCC (Yahweh) is the same as Allah. See this link for more info. Obama is also overly effusive in his public praise of Islam. For these reasons, it is correct to call Obama a “cultural Muslim” or “ethnic Muslim,” though he may not practice the religion. If you just put the word “cultural” in front of “Muslim,” it will be difficult to argue with that description. It just means he identifies culturally with Islam and is loyal to Islam. This is a rather obvious truth, indicated by his own public statements and his biographical book. It is not necessary to prove that Obama is secretly a Muslim. He has been quite open about his personal affection for Islam. He makes decisions, which puts Islamist (Muslim Brotherhood) interests above American interests. (see Egypt, Libya and Syria.)
However, that is not all he is and the perverse doctrine of his sect in Chicago also deserves to be examined. His supposedly “Christian” church in Chicago, does not have a traditional Christian doctrine, because it denies the unique divinity of Christ, as does Islam, which sees Christ as a prophet, not uniquely God.
Trinity church has a doctrine which did not require Obama to give up his personal Muslim identity. Black Liberation theology is not exclusionary as traditional Christianity is. Traditional Christians believe that Christianity is the only way to salvation. This is not the case with Black Liberation Theology and it is obvious that Obama has no love for the traditional Christian church.
Black Liberation Theology is an accretionary doctrine, which embraces features of many religions, but holds that traditional Christianity (and America) are the tools of the Antichrist. The Antichrist is equated to white society. It is similar to and was inspired by the doctrine of Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam, which is also not orthodox Islam, but a black cult doctrine that poses as Islam, just as Trinity church poses as Christianity.
Cultural Muslims are religiously unobservant, secular or irreligious individuals who still identify with the Muslim culture due to family background, personal experiences, or the social and cultural environment in which they grew up.
The term is a political neologism paralleling the term “cultural Christian”.
Malise Ruthven (2000) discussed the terms “cultural Muslim” and “nominal Muslim” as follows:
There is, however, a secondary meaning to Muslim which may shade into the first. A Muslim is one born to a Muslim father who takes on his or her parents’ confessional identity without necessarily subscribing to the beliefs and practices associated with the faith, just as a Jew may describe him- or herself as Jewish without observing the Halacha. In non-Muslim societies, such Muslims may subscribe to, and be vested with, secular identities. The Muslims of Bosnia, descendants of Slavs who converted to Islam under Ottoman rule, are not always noted for attendance at prayer, abstention from alcohol, seclusion of women and other social practices associated with believing Muslims in other parts of the world. They were officially designated as Muslims by nationality to distinguish them from Orthodox Serbs and Catholic Croats under the former Yugoslav communist regime. The label Muslim indicates their ethnicity and group allegiance, but not necessarily their religious beliefs. In this limited context (which may apply to other Muslim minorities in Europe and Asia), there may be no contradiction between being Muslim and being atheist or agnostic, just as there are Jewish atheists and Jewish agnostics… It should be noted, however, that this secular definition of Muslim (sometimes the terms cultural Muslim or nominal Muslim are used) is very far from being uncontested.
Let’s connect the dots on eligibility. In the Sherlock Holmes short story, “Silver Blaze,” by Sir Authur Conan Doyle, the critical clue is that the watch dog did not bark when a race horse is stolen.
Regarding Obama’s eligibility, about 300 Republican dogs are not barking. These dogs are not even making a whimper about it, even though the evidence is being paraded right before their eyes by people like Sheriff Arpaio and attorneys Van Iron and Larry Clayman. Many have been wondering why, absolutely astounded that the Congress refuses to recognize this issue, while Obama has an obviously dodgy birth certificate posted on the White House website, where anyone can verify the problems with it.
In 2008, the Senate had a hearing on the eligibility of John McCain, when the question of his eligibility seemed much less in question. It would have been very embarrassing for the Republicans, if the Democrats had made a big issue of McCain’s eligibility and we know that both parties have desired for years to make an end-run around the Constitution and very much broaden the eligibility requirements for the presidency without bothering with those pesky rules for amending the Constitution.
So, the circumstantial evidence leads one to assume that the congressional Democrats and Republicans made a crooked deal to bypass the Constitutional requirements for eligibility.
If the Democrats would endorse John McCain’s eligibility, the Republicans would ignore any questions about Obama’s eligibility. Both parties will ignore future such eligibility issues for potential candidates, like Republican fair-haired boy, Marco Rubio, and others.
Obama & Boehner Schmooze While ‘Rome’ BurnsPeople need to understand that pretty much the same global financial elites control both parties and the reason nothing can be done about Obama’s corruption and trampling of the Constitution is that the Republican leadership is complicit.
The elites vote with their donations. The little people go to the polls and vote like zombies, pretty much for whichever candidate gets the most contributions from the global elites. Obama is openly having fundraisers in China and Europe now.
The Republicans do not want to do anything about it. They don’t need Harry Reed to investigate Obama in the House. This is likely also the reason that the courts will not do a legitimate investigation of anything that has to do with Obama’s eligibility.
The elites do not want Obama or other corrupt politicians to be severely punished or even embarrassed, because they are doing exactly what they want them to do. They like illegal immigration and the Constitution to be ignored. They want to concentrate power in Washington, D.C., because centralized power is easier to influence with money.
The two parties, with the cooperation of the media, lock out any third parties from being able to compete and spoil the game. Sure, the Democrats and Republicans still feel competitive with each other in elections, but it is like two Rugby teams of the same fraternity competing to win. It makes better theater. These parties are competing for the right to pillage and loot the country for another four years.
It does not have to be a conspiracy. The people with money recognize their common interests and act independently to support those who will help them reach their common goals.
If you think Romney is much different from Obama, you are very much deceiving yourself. Romney will, at best, represent a somewhat slower pace along the road to total control by the oligarchy.
The public is kept polarized, so that they will remain loyal to their respective parties. As long as people keep voting for whomever can raise the most money, this charade is going to continue.
Americans – Ready to Jump?There is an old saying that in order to boil a live frog you have to turn up the heat slowly. If you turn up the heat too quickly, the frog will jump out to liberty.
In recent decades international financial interests have become a much more important influence on American politics. Because so much money is necessary to win a presidential campaign, such forces drive both parties and they are to a large extent the same people. This does not have to be a tight conspiracy of a few people. It can be a movement of a large number of wealthy people, who have interests that overlap to a large degree.
The American people are outraged by Obama and are about ready to jump. Romney represents a slight reduction in the heat. He is also a lackey of those anti-American forces that would destroy American sovereignty and concentrate power in the hands of a few lapdogs and quislings, who are willing to kow-tow to these special interests. Election of Romney will just guarantee that this process of the destruction of American sovereignty continues, though at a somewhat reduced pace.
Obama has criminal, traitorous intent. He needs to be exposed and imprisoned. Election of Romney will just save Obama from American justice and they will be ready to do this all over again in four years.
Because there are only two easy choices does not mean that one of them has to be a *good* choice. That is a fallacy of logic that Republican zombies and kool-aid drinkers have been promoting regularly. There may not be an good and easy choice as has been the case several times in American history already. Sometimes Americans have had to bite the bullet and do things that are not easy or risk-free in order to keep their liberty.
