Trump Supporters Charged With Fake Hate Crime By Refugee in San Diego

zappypizzaThree San Diego men, Sean Arevalo, Terrance Crow, and Scott Peretti, are accused of having “beat down” a young Somalian refugee with a chair and brass knuckles in the “Zappy Pizza” take-out shop at 5971 University Ave in San Diego. The three Americans were charged with battery and assault with a deadly weapon (brass knuckles) with a hate crime add-on. The penalty could be several years in prison. This allegedly occurred on October 30, 2016, just a week before the election. This harsh prosecution is motivated by politics. We have an Assistant DA with a far-left, La Raza mentality, who was looking to nail someone on a frivolous hate-crime charge, so it can be used for political propaganda purposes. Many Trump opponents were eagerly looking for hate crimes among Trump supporters at that time, which they could trumpet just before the election.

San Diego Deplorable Three Defense Fund
(See amount collected at the bottom of this page.)
btncontribute2


Note: The trial has been set for the following date. More details will be forthcoming.

San Diego Superior Court
September 5, 2017
County Courthouse
330 W Broadway
San Diego, Ca


San Diego media outlets have already convicted them, conducting a shameless media lynching. The story was syndicated by the Associated Press and has been published by other media outlets all around the nation, with very little effort by the media to learn the other side of the story. Here are some of the slanderous, early media reports.

Police call attack on Somali man a hate crime by San Diego Union-Tribune

3 Arrested in Attack on Muslim Man at San Diego Restaurant by NBC7 San Diego

This is an audio recording that this blogger made of an eye witness two days after the incident. This witness said that the news reports were “nonsense.”

Click here for a transcript of the above noisy audio file.

There were no brass knuckles used nor any other “deadly weapon” and the Somali was not hit over the head with a chair as the media slanderously portrayed the incident from only one side. An independent witness was not difficult to find. The incident started when two of the accused, Scott Peretti and Terrance Crow, were ordering take-out pizza at the counter. Crow declared “VOTE TRUMP” The Somali refugee took offense at that and replied “FUCK TRUMP” In return, Crow said “FUCK ISLAM” Then, a mutual altercation started, a minor scuffle.

One Somalian moved on Peretti in an threatening way, their faces only inches apart. After having warned not to come close Peretti struck him with his bare fist in self defense, producing a minor bump/abrasion on his forehead. Peretti’s other friend, Terry Crow, did not hit anyone. Sean Arevalo was waiting in the car rushed in to break it up and get his friends out of there. Sean Arevalo had some car keys in his fist. The cloth lanyard attached to the keys wrapped around his fingers was apparently mistaken for brass knuckles. The keys were inside his fist. Even so, it was stated in open court recently that Arevalo never hit anyone, whether he had brass knuckles or not. No one is apparently claiming that he threatened anyone with brass knuckles. Only one of the Muslim witnesses claimed that he saw brass knuckles, the younger friend of the alleged “victim.” None of the other 10 witnesses saw the mythical brass knuckles.

The Somali “victim” refused medical attention that night. The police report said his wounds were minor. However, he is the son of a politically influential leader, Ahmed Sahid, in the Somali/East African community, which reportedly numbers around 30K (potential voters) in San Diego. Due to such political influence and a ambitious Deputy DA of Hate Crimes, this minor altercation received so much attention.

According to the manager, there were no video cameras operating in the Pizza shop. The police did not arrive until the incident was over. They arrested the three Americans at another location based on the version of the story of the Somalian. Another Zappy customer, who had just arrived on the scene, followed them to the house around the corner and called 911.

The three men were arraigned on November 7th in Superior Court charged with battery with a felony hate crime add-on. There was no deadly weapon. Showing support for Trump should not be classified as a hate crime. Expressing disapproval of Islam is free speech, protected by the Bill of Rights. Americans have every right to disapprove publicly of a inherently theocratic religion founded by a “prophet,” who was a warlord, bandit, mass murderer, sex-slave monger and child molester. This is according to the Islamic literature, the hadith and the sirah.

They have “multi-cultural policing” in this area of San Diego, where tens of thousands of refugees reside. However, it is not the duty of the police to enforce Sharia law in the area, which is called “Little Mogadishu.” Expressing opposition to Islam should not result in a felony hate crime charge. The charges against these three Americans should be promptly dismissed. They have already suffered too much abuse at the hands of an overzealous, predatory deputy district attorney, politically-correct police and the sensationalist media for their politically-incorrect opinions.

Hate crimes are “thought crimes,” Orwellian in nature, intended to be applied mainly to certain segments of society to punish them for historic events, for which the current generation has no responsibility. But that is beside the point in this case. These three men went into the shop just to pick up pizza, not with the intention of committing a “hate crime.” The scuffle resulted from a mutual verbal altercation that did not start with hate words.

If Muslims want to live in America, they have to learn to accept free speech, even if it may be rude speech, without becoming violently enraged. The overly multi-cultural San Diego police and district attorney ought to uphold their oath of office, which requires them to defend our constitutional rights, not to defend Islam.

The original, defamatory story was blown out of all proportion by the media, and rapidly spread around the country. This was because it was election time and a supposed hate crime committed against a Muslim refugee plays well in the liberal media, who present it as a fact without doing any real journalistic investigation. An independent, disinterested witness to the incident called the media reporting “nonsense” and “irritating” that the media went into a feeding frenzy about something that “didn’t happen,” he said.

San Diego Deplorable Three Defense Fund
btncontribute2


Citizen Condemns Encinitas “Welcoming” Unvetted Refugees

Encinitas Welcoming City for Terror and Drug Cartels
Encinitas Welcoming City for Terror and Drug Cartels
Encinitas Council members, Tony Kranz, Lisa Shaffer and Catherine Blakespear passed a resolution last March, called a “Welcoming City” resolution for refugees and immigrants. This makes Encinitas part of a network of cities, which will be advertised as preferred destinations for refugees and immigrants. Many of these refugees will not be properly vetted and not legally eligible for asylum, but will be from areas where there is strong support for terrorist groups and drug cartels. For this reason, some of these refugees will have sympathy for terrorist groups or involvement with drug gangs. The resolution has also being promoted by Kranz in other cities and for acceptance by the entire County, as a “Welcoming County.”

Politicians want more refugees for political reasons, cheap labor and eventually as compliant voters. Persons fleeing poverty and crime are not legally eligible for asylum in the U.S. The Obama administration is stretching the legal definition of “refugee,” in order to do an end-run around immigration law. Those cities and counties, who join the “Welcoming Communities” network, are aiding this effort to corrupt the legitimate refugee system for their own political purposes. The actual words of the resolution do not matter a great deal. The intent is disguised in order to avoid opposition. The Encinitas resolution was passed with the support of outsiders and special interests without residents knowing what it was about or getting a real chance to comment on it.

Lemon Grove Welcomes Terror and Drug Cartels (Videos)

Lemon Grove, a Welcoming City  for pseudo refugees and Illegal aliens
Lemon Grove, a Welcoming City
for pseudo refugees and Illegal aliens
Mayor Mary Sessom and the City Council of Lemon Grove passed on the sly a resolution, called a “Welcoming City” resolution for Refugees and Immigrants. This makes them part of a network of cities, which will be advertised as preferred destinations for refugees and immigrants. Many of these refugees will not be properly vetted and not legally eligible for asylum, but will be from areas where there is strong support for terrorist groups and drug cartels. For this reason, many of these refugees will have sympathy for terrorist groups or involvement with drug gangs.

Politicians want more refugees for political reasons. Persons fleeing poverty and crime are not legally eligible for asylum in the U.S. The Obama administration is stretching the legal definition of “refugee,” in order to do an end-run around immigration law. Those cities and counties, who join the “Welcoming Communities” network by resolution or proclamation, are aiding this effort to corrupt the legitimate refugee system for their political purposes. The actual words of the Resolution do not matter a great deal. The intent is disguised in order to avoid opposition.

Some of use went to the cuoncil two times The following video is a collection of News reports about the second meeting on October 18,2016

This is a video containing the complete comments for and against the resolution at the second meeting.

This is video of the Mayor slandering a citizen, before he could even speak. She accused him of causing someone to threaten her daughter and grandson on Facebook. Evidence was requested of the threat, but nothing was ever produce. We have to assume Mayor Sessom is vindictive and an outright liar.

This is video of all the public comments during our first meeting with the City Council on October 11, 2016.

This video contains the audio of the comments during the meeting when the resolution was passed on July 19, 2016. There was only input from a representative of a speacial interest group, Ginger Jacobs of the San Diego Immigration Rights Consortium. There was no input from ordinary citizens. They did not understand what it is about, because Mayor Sessom and the City Council kept is quiet.

NEWSPAPER ARTICLES

Lemon Grove council takes heat on immigrant proclamation – San Diego Union Tribune

LEMON GROVE MAYOR RESPONDS TO THREATS AGAINST HER FAMILY OVER WELCOMING COMMUNITIES RESOLUTION – East County Magazine

Lemon Grove Welcomes Drug / Terror Refugees

frankfurt02On July 19th the City Council passed a resolution making Lemon Grove a “Welcoming City” for Immigrants, Refugees and Asylees. The “Welcoming Communities” program is an Obama initiative, an out-growth of his New Americans Project. There’s an organized, funded effort by far-left, anti-American open-borders groups to push cities across the country to accept and promote resettlement of un-vetted, so-called refugees. These people are often from areas dominated by terrorist groups and drug cartels, who may have reason to want to infiltrate into the US. This resolution was requested by the extreme leftist, progressive group, Alliance San Diego, apparently with no input at all from the residents of Lemon Grove.

The Resolution states that our Constitution guarantees the rights of ALL People. This is not true, the US Constitution only protects American Citizens. This is a core issue. The idea of universal citizenship is a Marxist utopian concept. We saw already what happened in Germany, when they tried to apply this utopian idea and opened their borders to everyone. Economic refugees are not recognized as legal refugees by US or international law and must be deported. Obama has recently been granting entry to almost anyone detained by the border patrol, if someone has trained to to say the right words. This is his way of bypassing the immigration laws, because most of these people will never show up in court.

This resolution is like a flashing neon sign, saying send refugees to Lemon Grove. It’s actually City law. It’s not clear, whether it was intended or not, but the way it’s stated it incorrectly grants foreigners the same rights as US citizens in Lemon Grove. Probably, it’s propaganda that the Marxist groups pushing this effort insert into the resolution.

The Welcoming City concept apparently started in Tucson, when Arizona banned Sanctuary Cities. It is like Sanctuary City, version 2.0, designed to survive legal challenges and it includes more support of (illegal) refugees. Obama took this took this concept and is spreading it nationwide, so that something like sanctuary cities can survive, for example, a Trump administration, if Trump should win.

Video: Citizens Oppose City Welcoming Un-Vetted “Refugees” And Win

Imperiasl Beach Welcome SyriansMayor Dedina of Imperial Beach proclaimed it to be a Welcoming City, which puts it in the network of Welcoming Communities around the country, who are inviting questionable refugees, asylees and immigrants to move to their city. The Citizens of Imperial Beach, Ca fought back and had the proclamation retracted.

When a city declares itself to be a “Welcoming City” they join a network of other welcoming cities. The far-left unions, nonprofits, pseudo-religious groups and community organizers, who are funded to support the Welcoming Cites effort, claim it will have not impact on the city. But it is like putting out a welcome mat for every “refugee” in the country to come and resettle in your community.

Obama is using the refugee and asylum process to do an end-run around the immigration law. He has made it policy to accept just about anyone, who claims to be a refugee, give them a slip of paper with a court date and them let them loose in our streets to disappear. Most never intend to show up in court.

The first thing we did was obtain video of the Imperial Beach City Council when the proclamation was made and upload it to YouTube, where a lot more people would see it. City Councils and the supporters try to keep this quiet. Exposing it to the light of day goes a long way in helping to overturn this obnoxious effort with the nice-sounding name.

If you want to see all the video made about this situation in Imperial Beach, go to this YouTube playlist.

Playlist – Imperial Beach Residents Stand Against “Welcoming” Refugees