Church Sheltering Thousands of Caravaners in San Diego Exposed

Caravaners rush the border. The sign reads,
“The Third World Is Now Here”.
Christ United Methodist Church in San Diego, Ca has sheltered about 5,000 Haitian refugees and 5,000 caravan-style refugees, who were mostly fraudulent. They only have up to a couple hundred on any one day, because they only stay a day or two and then are then transported to their ultimate destination. The fare is often paid for them by the nonprofit, which is to be funded by the state government. You can go to the website of the church here.

They are described as “fraudulent”, because most of them just disappear into the streets of the US without ever obtaining asylum. They are coached to say the right words to pass a very minimal credible fear interview and some of the disappear immediately, others go though the process, but are denied asylum by a court. DHS Secretary Nielsen says about 90% never obtain asylum status. Passing a credible fear interview is not “vetting”. The are released with documents that identify them as “legal” residents, until they fail to file within a year for asylum status, fail to show up for their asylum hearings or are denied asylum by a court.

A group of politically-radical, progressive nonprofits has been paying for the costs of sheltering the 90% asylum fraudsters, called the “Rapid Response Network” (RNN). Gavin Newsom has pledged $25 million to the RRN from State of California to pay the costs for the next year.

Christ United Methodist Church at capacity, needs help preparing for incoming migrant caravan

The County of San Diego has approved use of the now vacant Family Courthouse at 1555 sixth avenue for use by the RRN in the future. The County has already been paying medical costs. On a cost per day basis, about 10 times as much is spent on these dubious refugees as they do on the local homeless Americans.

The 90% fraudsters are supposed to move to the new location by February 15th, 2019. At the date of this writing there is no evidence the move has taken place. It could be delayed or even cancelled, because there is no large caravan on the horizon coming to San Diego at this time or because the County just becomes embarrassed about their support for the asylum fraud. Most of the County Supervisors are purported to be Republicans, but they try to mimic leftist Democrats as closely as possible as a survival strategy.

The refugees this church is serving are caravaners or other similar fake “refugees”, who are exploiting a loophole in the asylum law to gain entry into the US, even if they have no expectation of ever obtaining asylum.

In spite of what you may have been led to believe by the media or certain politicians. A large proportion of the last two caravans is now residing in the US. Either they crossed by gaming the asylum system or they crossed the border in the more traditional illegal way with a coyote. Single adult men generally cross illegally and adolescents travelling alone or adults with minors cross by exploiting the “Flores” loophole in the asylum process.

Even when there are no “caravans”, there are always large numbers of fraudulent asylum seekers at the border crossing, who come as individuals and small groups from Central America, southern Mexico and other countries around the world, crossing the border in this way by misrepresenting themselves as refugees and exploiting children as their get-in-free ticket.

The “Flores Agreement” requires asylum seekers with minors or minors travelling alone to be released after 20 days. (You can google it to learn more.) That is, they are released before it can be determined, whether they are qualified for asylum or not and before they can be adequately vetted or checked for diseases.

There is really no clear limit as to how many can be admitted to the United States in this fraudulent manner and it has been ramped up in the last few years by the progressive nonprofits, who organize, encourage and support the caravans. This kind of asylum fraud is the wet dream of radical progressives, who want to “fundamentally transform” America via immigration from the Third World.

CAUTION: No one should do anything that might remotely be considered a crime, even a very minor crime, at either of the two pseudo-refugee shelters, because it could very well be elevated to a felony hate crime. Offensive telephone calls or emails should be avoided, also.

RELATED ARTICLES

San Diego Provides Building to House Caravaners/Fake Refugees

San Diego Provides Building to House Caravaners/Fake Refugees

San Diego County Board of Supervisors approved use of a vacant court building at 1555 6th Ave in downtown San Diego for use by the mostly pseudo refugees that have crossed the border as part of the Caravan or separate from the caravan.

UPDATE: An expected lawsuit to make the federal government pay to support the asylum fraudsters is apparently not on the agenda for Tuesday, Feb. 12. So we are not going to the County Board meeting to speak at that time. Of Course, concerned citizens can go and speak anytime against it during the public commentary part of the meeting.

The refugees are only supposed to spend a short time in San Diego. During that time the County and State will support them with food, housing legal help and transportation to to the destination of their choice. At least that was how it was sold to the County supervisors. The State of California will provide $25 million to various nonprofits to support the effort.

A number of people were at the building on January 30, to do a site survey and make a plan to make the building ready for its new purpose.

Both the red brick building and the white split-level building next to it will be used to house the fake refugees.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The building will be is in a great location for protests with high visibility downtown and convenient parking. There are several parking lots nearby. While parking downtown can be expensive it is discounted on the weekend.

This is the only comment that was made against the proposal at the County Supervisors meeting on January 30, 2019.

See the full video if the discussion of this item at this link:

Here is the contact information for the San Diego County Board. Feel free to give them a piece of you mind. Please, do not be overly offensive, profane or threatening, though.

District 1
greg.cox@sdcounty.ca.gov

District 2
dianne.jacob@sdcounty.ca.gov

District 3
kristin.gaspar@sdcounty.ca.gov

District 4
Nathan.Fletcher@sdcounty.ca.gov

District 5
Jim.Desmond@sdcounty.ca.gov

RELATED ARTICLES

Church Sheltering Thousands of Caravaners in San Diego Exposed

Chicano Gang-banger Enraged by US Flag

Jesse and I went to Friendship Park on the evening of Novmember 15, 2018, where the Caravan demonstrations have been taking place. There we ran into a member of the Oceanside Pascoli gang and his family. They were enraged that I was carrying an American flag and wearing a USA cap.

You can understand why this guy is frustrated, he said he’s a chief in the Pascoli gang in Oceanside and was probably looking forward to getting new gang member recruits from this caravan. Part of the reason Tijuanans are turning against the caravan, is they know most of them are likely to end up being stuck in Tijuana and they think it will add to their already terrible crime problem. There are still many Haitian refugees in Tijuana from two years ago.

This photo added to serve as a thumbnail for Facebook posts.

Can the President Send Armed Troops To Protect The Border?

The Posse Comitatus Act is often cited as the reason troops cannot be used to protect the border. As has been experienced, the perception of the meaning of certain laws sometimes change over time, due to activist judges, who legislate from the bench, progressive politicians, who believe the Constitution (and the law) should be a “living document” whose interpretation should change, according to the whim of the times. A biased, propagandistic media, aligned with progressives and neo-Marxists, helps to brainwash the public. This diabolical trend really needs to be reversed and laws enforced according to their original intent.

The Posse Comitatus Act, passed in 1878. It was updated in the 1950’s to include the Air Force. Enacted as part of a deal at the end of Reconstruction, it was intended to prevent the military from enforcing martial law on the general public, as it did in the South during Reconstruction.

18 U.S. Code § 1385 – Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatus

Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

The Posse Comitatus act contains an exception, “except in cases and other circumstances authorized by the Constitution of act of Congress”.

In the U.S. Constitution, the United States is required to protect each of the states against an “invasion”. An ordinary law cannot override the Constitution. So, an exception in a law is not necessary to carry out a constitutional mandate.

U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 4.

The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.

It does not say “armed invasion”, “violent invasion” or even “hostile invasion”, but just “invasion”. There are probably 500 thousand to one million foreigners crossing the border illegally every year. What is that, if not an invasion? At times it is an armed, hostile and violent invasion, too. It seems appropriate for the President to use the Armed Forces as required to stop this invasion, not just one caravan, but to help shut down the mass illegal border crossing that has been going on for decades unabated.

U.S. Army soldier Guarding the border around 1915
The Border Patrol was not created until 1924. Between 1878 and 1924, the Army guarded the Border, for nearly half a century after the Posse Comitatus Act was enacted. For that reason it seems very clear that the original intent of the Posse Comitatus Act did not include prohibiting the Army from protecting the border.

The image on the right is the cover of a book about one soldier’s experiences, when he was assigned to guard the U.S. border during the 1910’s, a decade before the Border Patrol existed.

Below is another photo from the same book of a squad of troops in 1916 in full combat gear, guarding the border, eight years before the Border Patrol existed. In both images the Rio Grande is in the background, that is the U.S. border with Mexico.

It seems absurd to think that the Constitution would not allow the President to protect the border against invasion by hundreds of thousands of foreign, illegal border crossers every year. That was not the intention of the framers of the Constitution and it obviously was not the intention of those who passed the Posse Comitatus Act, either.

At this time mainly observers are needed, who are directly on the border and are armed so that they can defend themselves, if necessary. Military observers can report any activity to the Border Patrol, who can actually make the arrests.

While waiting for a more effective border barrier to be built, a few thousand effectively-deployed troops would make decisive difference, virtually shutting down illegal border crossing.

Below is a Texas National Guardsman observing for the Border Patrol on the Rio Grande. The military can play the same role and is directly under the control of the President.

Texas National Guard at observation posts along the border in Starr County, Texas.

Texas would allow their guardsmen to be armed and directly on the border acting as direct observers, California would not. States could put other limitations on the guard, making them much less effective.

Since the national guard consists of part-time soldiers with families and jobs it is a greater hardship to deploy them for a long time period. Military support of the Border Patrol needs to be uniform and well-planned to be effective. They need to be well-coordinated with the Border Patrol and deployed directly on the border with arms, until the southern border is really under control.

Improving Border Security Without Congress

Recently, Chris Harris gave me a list of three actions which would have a huge impact and can probably be implemented by President Trump by executive action, without Congress.

Harris is Director of Political and Legislative Affairs for Local 1613 of the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) and is also a recently retired Border Patrol agent.

The three items are:

• Make Mexico a “Safe Third Country” for refugees
• Restrict the rules defining who can receive asylum
• Make e-verify a requirement for all employers

See the document below for more explanation and status.

RELATED POSTS

Zero Tolerance Prosecution of Illegal Border Crossers